Comments on: impNERD’s Rant: Addressing Entrecard Rumors

By: gengen

gengen — Sun, 10 May 2009 14:13:50 +0000

I agree with the #4 rumors that there are sites that are not god for posting in in our blog maybe some are putting it but i rejected it most of the time. All of my blog is a family friendly and it is not appropriate to put those almost naked women in my blog. My visitors will not come back if that happen it will ruin my reputation.

By: Casey

Casey — Sun, 10 May 2009 12:48:09 +0000

Hey impNERD, yeah I wasn’t saying they were ads for porn sites, which they weren’t, I was just pointing out the fact that there are some inappropriate pictures. Sorry I did not make that clear in my post, I do agree with your opinion on the rumor. I have yet to come across a porn site from Entrecard.

By: impNERd

impNERd — Sun, 10 May 2009 06:40:32 +0000

Thanks for the link, I appreciate it.

Some of the ads can be seen as inappropriate (and I understand why you would) but none are actual porn. Even blogs on EC show pictures like the ones you describe. Actually, I would say almost every celebrity blog does, but showing cleavage-even if it is a lot-doesn’t make it pornography.

I am not saying this against you, I’m just saying it because the rumor is a ridiculous claim. Just because someone thinks something is inappropriate that doesn’t make it pornography or something which should be banned throughout the entire system. If that was the case, there wouldn’t be atheist blogs, christian blogs, gay blogs, or even the sex talk blogs.